Archive register. This document is the belief layer of its functional companion: held as position, not theorem, in the author's first person. Per house doctrine it is never citable by live Adaptor House systems; it is published at historicalpresent.com/shared so the record shows not only what was argued but what was believed while arguing it.
I believe all three collisions are real and the first is urgent: a grading derived inside a Tarskian theory should not name its values with that theory's satisfaction vocabulary, and the underscore in the bindings file is the system itself telling us so.
I believe the three-layer repair — string, handle, prose — is stronger than the coinage it replaced in draft, because I watched the coinage fail: the first candidate set was made of good words, and good words were exactly the problem. The draft history is part of this record: a table of Latin participles — inert, dormant, quiescent, incipient, latent, imminent — was proposed, argued, and withdrawn in a single review, not because any word collided but because every word was an association, and an associative name can never be wrong, which is why it can never be right.
And I believe the third layer matters beyond this note: updating the reading of yin and yang by the method of trope — string first, prose lastly, corpus as auditor — is not merely a human endeavor but a pure collaboration with AI as language model, each doing the thing the other cannot: the model holding ten thousand candidate sentences against a string without fatigue, the author knowing which claim the house is willing to publish under its name. The citation metadata of this series records that collaboration as a first-class fact, not an acknowledgment.